[Felvtalk] feline leuk

[Rachel Dagner]

I would say maybe test the kittens if they are positive mommy probably has it if negative it may be a bad test. Praying very hard it is a bad test. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 13, 2016, at 10:06 PM, Kelley S <moonvine at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Many times a "slight positive" is a test that isn't correctly read.  I can't say it is all the time.  I had a kitty who tested "slight positive" who came up negative on retest.  No way would I separate the babies, if she is positive and they are going to be infected they're likely already infected.  Just my opinion.
> 
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Roxanne Smith <rescuek9lives at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> Hi all, I am in a rescue group, and one of our mommas came back as "slightly" positive per the vet, I must say that confuses me as the test was a combo test... Thoughts???
>> In addition, she has two three week old babies, opinions on whether or not they should be separated???
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Felvtalk mailing list
>> Felvtalk at felineleukemia.org
>> http://felineleukemia.org/mailman/listinfo/felvtalk_felineleukemia.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Felvtalk mailing list
> Felvtalk at felineleukemia.org
> http://felineleukemia.org/mailman/listinfo/felvtalk_felineleukemia.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://felineleukemia.org/pipermail/felvtalk_felineleukemia.org/attachments/20160614/5e5ff11b/attachment.html>